The problem of celebrities stealing their images through false means is still serious.

Reading the article, I was really shocked... I wonder if there are people who believe this and ask for casting...

I think he was actually an acquaintance of Huh Gak from a long time ago, but we don't even keep in touch anymore.

After putting Huh Gak's name forward, they were promoting him by hosting wedding songs and events...

Moreover, the stars whose images were actually used don't even know the content...

Heo Gak also didn't know the content.......;;

 

Well, it's not like I'm searching the internet every day.

How many issues do celebrities have with their portrait rights?

There seem to be so many people without a conscience.

 

 

Promoting celebrity congratulatory song singing with Huh Gak at the forefront
Singer's side claims "we didn't know" and concerns over portrait rights violations

Group Red Velvet, singer Sung Si-kyung, and Young Tak (from left). Courtesy of their respective agencies and Newsis.

A company has been identified for using the portrait rights of famous singers without permission. The shocking revelations reveal that they misled consumers with phrases like "Guaranteed by Huh Gak" and exploited their trust.
 
If you search for the problematic company name or the keyword "chukga" on a portal site, an advertisement titled "Singer Huh Gak's Top Match" will appear.

Singer Huh Gak. Photo provided by Newsis.

Related search results include celebrity wedding songs, social events, and more. The company's homepage highlights phrases like "We guarantee wedding songs and events with singer Huh Gak" and "We'll send you a list of truly affordable options."

Capture of the event company's homepage.
Banner advertisement for the event company found on a portal site.

When World Biz & Sports World began its investigation, the company's website featured a "Celebrity Congratulatory Songs" section featuring profile photos and names of dozens of singers. The group Red Velvet was the first to catch the eye.
 
While it's not common for a top-tier celebrity singer to sing a congratulatory song, it's not entirely unheard of. They typically attend the weddings of family members or acquaintances and offer their congratulations with a congratulatory song.
 
This company placed Red Velvet's photo at the top of the congratulatory song corner. Is it possible for Red Velvet, who are currently active under different agencies, to receive a casting fee and sing a congratulatory song?
 
When we contacted SM Entertainment, Red Velvet's agency, regarding this matter, the agency responded, "Red Velvet does not send congratulatory songs through companies. The agency also directly coordinates events."
 
When the agency contacted the company to protest, Red Velvet's photos were taken down. The company explained that it was "an error that occurred during the website renewal process."

A list of singers currently on the company's website. Website capture.

The situation was similar for some of the singers listed on the site. The response they received was, "Even if I do attend events, I'll only appear at events for which I've signed a contract through my agency."
 
The reporter contacted the company directly to inquire about pricing. When inquiring about travel expenses for singer Sung Si-kyung, whose face and name are listed on the website's congratulatory song/event section, the company responded, "Sung Si-kyung doesn't sing congratulatory songs." However, the company quickly responded, "He does host events (though he doesn't sing congratulatory songs)." When asked again about the event booking fee, the company responded, "How much are you considering?" Upon hearing this, Sung Si-kyung's agency expressed bewilderment.

Profile photos of Red Velvet, Kim Bum-soo, and Na Yoon-kwon, singers eligible for the congratulatory song, provided on the website before the agency's protest. Screenshot from the website.

Profile photos of famous singers like Sung Si-kyung, Kim Bum-soo, Min Kyung-hoon, and Davichi were deleted. However, the problem is that the photos were removed after protests. There was no compensation for the affected celebrities or an explanation for customers who trusted the photos. Some agencies of celebrities still on the list, such as Song Ga-in and Young Tak, also expressed bewilderment, claiming they were "unknown companies."
 
It appears that the artist's portrait rights were used for a specific business without permission. This raises significant concerns, as the public may perceive this as a strategic partnership with an active artist and his agency.
 
However, Heo Gak, the face of the company, was unaware that his name and photo were being stolen.
 
On the 11th, a representative from Huh Gak's agency expressed anger, saying, "Huh Gak attended many wedding ceremonies, and a childhood friend made him a business proposal. They had collaborated several years ago, but they ended their relationship due to financial issues. They haven't even been in contact."
 
Attorney Lee In-cheol of Lee Law Firm emphasized, "If a celebrity's photo is used for commercial purposes without their consent, they can claim infringement of their portrait rights. Since their name has been misappropriated, this also constitutes infringement of their name rights. They can pursue civil damages for tortious acts." He added, "If their name and photo continue to be used without permission, they can file an injunction demanding the photos be taken down."
 
Regarding this, the company stated, "We received permission to use the photos 4-5 years ago. Some people asked us to list them. However, we have revised the photos for those who recently contacted us to take them down, among those who changed agencies in the meantime." They added, "We wanted to share this information when the event came up. We will call you today to confirm and take action."
 
Regarding the use of Heo Gak's face and name in terms of the company's credibility, he was cautious about his comments after hearing the agency's response.
 
As the demand for celebrity congratulatory songs grows, the event industry is actively promoting its own strengths to attract clients. This process creates a new role for intermediaries. Clients inquire about bookings, and the companies secure the singers and collect a commission.
 
Celebrities and their agencies who are unaware that their portrait rights are being used without permission, as well as the public who trust and request such services, must be vigilant.

0
0
Comments63
  • Profile Image
    taLynx797
    허락을 맡은게 아니었군요. 이미지 도용 심각합니다.
  • Profile Image
    스테파노
    연예인 허위로 이미지 도용하는 문제 여전히 심각한 거 같아요 진짜 이건 바로 잡아야되요 안그러면 안될 거 같아요
  • Profile Image
    biSeal289
    저작권인식이 없나봐요 너무 안타까운일이에요
  • Profile Image
    yoIguana946
    진짜 어이가..오류같은 소리하네
    Ai이미지도 그렇고 저것도 참 문제에
  • Profile Image
    무니22
    연예인 허위로 이미지 도용하는 문제 여전히 심각하군요 개선의 조치가 정말 많이 필요할것같아요
  • Profile Image
    soOstrich404
    고소해야할거같아요 아직도 저작권인식 멀었네요
  • Profile Image
    dkStarfish511
    연예인사진도용문제 심각하죠.. 다 고소미 먹여야해요
  • Profile Image
    kiChinchilla900
    아직도 이런일이 있군요 초상권 너무 무시당해요
  • Profile Image
    kiZonkey901
    허위로 홍보하는 곳들이 많나보네요 고소해버려야죠
  • Profile Image
    crLlama706
    연예인 도용문제 심각하네요 법적 처벌 제대로 받았으면 좋겠어요
  • Profile Image
    doldol2world
    아직도 이런일이 있네요
    벌금 세게 매겼으면 좋겠어요
  • Profile Image
    곰득이
    정말 큰 문제네요 회사측에서도 강력하게 대응을 해야할 거 같아요 
  • Profile Image
    seLizard381
    허위도용은 진따 아니라고 봅니다
    이런 건 강력하게 대응해야겠지여
  • Profile Image
    noGazelle925
    무단으로 사진을 도용한 업체 강력히 처벌 받아야 합니다.
    관련 가수들 손해배상 받아야 해요
  • Profile Image
    njXerus377
    이런 문제가 아직도 심각하군요
    이런 문제 다시는 일어나지 말았으면 해요
  • Profile Image
    woJackal772
    이건 뉴스에서도 많이 언급하더라구요..
    심각한 문제 입니다. 
  • Profile Image
    d1Yak898
    이런거 진짜 심각하죠
    연예인  사진도 막 갖다쓰고
  • Profile Image
    sasasa2331
    예전부터 문제였는데 요새는 더 심각하네요 처벌이 세져야할텐데요
  • Profile Image
    4035
    이런 문제가 있군요 제대로 대처 해야겠네요
  • Profile Image
    5000만팬
    광고도 고심해서 고를텐데 저러면 너무 속상하겠어요
    이런건 처벌이 힘든가요?