What is the motel serial killer's Instagram ID? Face and personal information revealed (+h_svms)

The controversy over the disclosure of personal information of the Instagram account h_svms is growing as it spreads online in connection with the Gangbuk motel serial murders. We've compiled all the issues at once, including the distribution of faces, private sanctions, secondary harm, and even the standards for police disclosure of personal information.

1. Gangbuk Motel Serial Murders: What's the Current Status?

A female suspect in her 20s, accused of killing two men by handing them drugged drinks at a motel in Suyu-dong, Gangbuk-gu, Seoul, has been arrested and sent to the police.
Charges of murder, special assault, and violation of the Narcotics Control Act have been applied, and police are investigating whether he is a psychopath and whether there are any additional victims.

 

But there is something else that many people are curious about.
“Why don’t you reveal your identity?”

It has been reported that the police are currently not considering making personal information public.

2. Is the Instagram account h_svms true?

In online communities and social media, a specific Instagram account (h_svms) is being spread as if it were the suspect's account, along with his face photo, name, and age.

Here's the problem.

 

There has never been an official announcement that the account in question belongs to the suspect.

 

Yet, there are already photos circulating without mosaics, and in the comments,
- “This is the right person.”
- “Account that uploaded selfies”
The same words are being spread as if they were established facts.

This is the biggest controversy right now.

3. Why is face distribution a problem?

Unauthorized disclosure of the face and personal information of a non-public individual may be subject to legal punishment.

Especially in cases like this one where no official information has been released,

 

When speculative information spreads online,

- Possibility of harm to innocent third parties
- Secondary harm to the victim
- Spreading false information
Problems can occur simultaneously.

In fact, the comments are showing comments criticizing the suspect's appearance and even making disparaging remarks about the victim, which is increasing the controversy over secondary victimization.

4. Why are the standards for personal information disclosure so ambiguous?

When the police decide whether to disclose personal information,

1) The brutality of the means of the crime
2) Whether or not significant damage has occurred
3) Sufficient evidence exists
4) Citizens' right to know and public interest

 

The back is judged comprehensively.

However, some point out that the judgment varies from case to case because the “how cruel it must be” and “what the standard of public interest” is not specifically stated.

So in some cases
"Wouldn't an official disclosure be a better way to prevent online censorship?"
There are also opinions that say:

5. Why do private sanctions keep happening?

These days, whenever a violent incident breaks out, a similar pattern repeats itself.

1) Personal information not disclosed
2) Proliferation of assumed accounts online
3) Face, school, and acquaintance information are leaked.
4) Secondary harm in comments

There is also analysis that because the gap between legal sentiment and the system is so large, people are trying to make their own judgments.

However, private sanctions are likely to cause further damage.

 

Q&A

 

Q1. Has the identity of the suspect in the motel serial murders been revealed?
A. It has been reported that the police are currently not considering disclosing the identity of the person. No official disclosure has been made.

Q2. Is the Instagram account h_svms the suspect's account?
A. It is spreading online, but it has not been officially confirmed.

Q3. Can I be punished for sharing a photo of my face?
A. Unauthorized distribution of a non-public individual's face or personal information may result in legal liability, including defamation and violation of the Personal Information Protection Act.

Q4. Why don't you disclose your personal information?
A. The deliberation committee makes a decision after comprehensively considering the brutality of the crime, sufficiency of evidence, and public interest.

 

Check out popular posts in real time

 

Lalal Plastic Surgery Clinic Information Revealed? Price, Instagram, Changes, Eyes, Nose, Under-Eyes

Nam Chang-hee's wife was a dance contestant?! Instagram, age, Han Kang, IU, face, marriage, wife

Who are the shamans in "Fate War 49"? Ji Seon-doryeong, No Seol-bi, Lee So-bin, and Cheon Hae-hwa-shin.