April bullying conclusion summary (Lee Na-eun Lee Hyun-joo lawsuit result)

Recently, Lee Na-eun appeared on Kwaktube and the April bullying incident became a hot topic again.

There were so many things going on, I was curious about how the conclusion was reached.

1. April's Lee Hyun-joo's younger brother exposes Lee Hyun-joo's bullying incident at April

2. April members deny this and sue Lee Hyun-joo's younger brother for defamation.

3. As a result of the investigation, Lee Hyun-joo's younger brother was not charged with defamation and was not prosecuted.

The reason is that, as stated in the verdict below, it was concluded that Lee Hyun-joo suffered from group bullying within the group.

4. April member Kim Chae-won, who could not accept this, filed an objection and requested a reinvestigation.

Kim Chae-won's objection to the non-indictment was accepted, and a reinvestigation began.

5. However, the objection is concluded as not being sent.

There were interpersonal relationship problems, but it is difficult to clearly determine that it was bullying, making it difficult to determine whether it was false.

There have been 7 lawsuits so far, so I think it's called the 7th lawsuit, but it's not the 7th lawsuit that Lee Na-eun filed.

[conclusion]

In courts, it is difficult to clearly determine bullying in the context of interpersonal relationship issues, so a decision is made not to prosecute.