A Comprehensive Summary of History Distortion by the 21st Century Grand Military Wife! Northeast Project, Acting Skills, Apology, IU, Byun Woo-seok

The drama '21st Century Grand Prince's Wife,' which is nearing its conclusion, became a bigger topic of conversation due to the controversy over historical distortion than its ending.

In particular, despite being a work with a production budget in the 30 billion won range,

As various errors in the depiction of royal rituals and symbols were pointed out, it eventually led to the production team issuing an apology.

1. The controversy began with the 'Cheoncheonse' scene at the coronation.

21세기 대군부인 역사왜곡 총정리! 동북공정, 연기력, 사과문, 아이유, 변우석

Controversy began when "Cheoncheonse" was used instead of "Manse" at the king's coronation ceremony.

The scene that caused the most controversy was the coronation of Grand Prince Ian.
The subjects shouted "Long live for a thousand years" to the new king, an expression known to be generally used for monarchs of the feudal lord class rather than emperors.

Therefore, criticism continued that using 'Cheoncheonse' for a monarch of an independent state was an expression that lowered the king's status.

2. Controversy over wearing the crown of detention

It was pointed out that the crown worn by the king was also out of place. In the coronation scene, the crown worn by the king was a nine-sided crown, not a twelve-sided crown.

In addition, the use of the Four Guardian Gods as targets has become controversial. As China attempts to incorporate the history of Goguryeo and Balhae into its own history, the fact that the Four Guardian Gods (Blue Dragon, White Tiger, Vermilion Bird, and Black Tortoise) were consumed as targets rather than being sacred beings that protect the nation is facing fierce criticism.

3. Pointing out the expression 'Hongseo' and Chinese elements

There were continued reactions that Chinese expressions were mixed into the terminology and overall direction.

The fact that the king's death was described as 'Hungseo' instead of 'Bungeo' within the work also sparked controversy.

This also drew criticism that it was closer to the description of a vassal state, leading to reactions that it did not match the setting.

It was also pointed out that in some scenes, the staging resembled a Chinese tea ceremony rather than a traditional Korean tea ceremony.

4. Production team's apology and follow-up measures

The production team announced corrective measures after acknowledging the controversy. As the controversy escalated, the production team admitted to the lack of world-building and historical accuracy through an official apology.

Subsequently, they announced that they would modify the audio and subtitles of the problematic scene in reruns, VOD, and OTT, but

Criticism of the content already broadcast is not easily subsiding.

FAQ

Q. Why is 'Cheonse' a problem?
This is because it is an expression used for monarchs of the feudal lord class rather than emperors, so it can be interpreted as lowering the king's status.

Q. What is the difference between a denunciation crown and a ceremonial crown?
It is a headdress recognized as being one rank lower than the twelve-sided crown.

Q. Is it really historical distortion?
Many view this not as confirmed historical distortion, but as a controversy regarding errors in historical accuracy and issues with symbolic representation.

Q. What is the production team's position?

They acknowledged the lack of historical accuracy and apologized, stating that they would revise some scenes.