The Community 2 Test Revealed! What Will My Values Code Turn Out To?

The buzzworthy 'Values Code Test' is here ahead of the release of the Wavve Original [The Community 2: The Invisible Hand]! We've compiled everything from the Season 1 members' reactions and the questions to how to participate 🔥

You've all seen this test that keeps popping up on social media timelines lately, right? 😳 Ahead of the exclusive release of the Wavve Original [The Community 2: The Invisible Hand] on Friday, September 4, the Season 2 version of the 'Values Code Test,' which saw 1.8 million participants in Season 1, was released on September 1. I was curious too, so I tried participating right away, but the questions were tougher than I expected... Today, I'll summarize everything for you, from how to take the test to the Season 1 members' real reactions and interviews with the production team ✨

1. Where can I take the Values Code Test?

더 커뮤니티2 테스트 공개! 나의 가치관 코드는 어떻게 나올까?

The test is
👉 You can participate here do.

It consists of a total of 37 questions, and since the name is optional and only displayed in the results, you can participate anonymously.

If you solve all the tests My values based on three indicators They say they will show it.

Whether you consider 'meaning' or 'practicality' more important in life
When allocating resources in society, should 'structure' or 'individual ability' be prioritized?
When moral values conflict, whether to follow 'long-agreed principles' or pursue the 'greatest benefit for the greatest number'

It is a method that tells you your unique value code by assigning scores across these three axes 😳

2. What were the reactions of people who actually tried it?

As soon as the test was released, reviews poured in on X (formerly Twitter) as well. One user shared a link saying, "The Community 2 Values Code Test is out!!!!!!", A comment stating, "This time, it seems the questions are focused on reality, the individual, society, idealism, and ethics, rather than a simple yes/no." They left a comment saying that while the binary choice approach of Season 1 was maintained, the areas covered felt more specialized.

3. Preview of the actual questions, opinions were divided.

Summarizing three of the questions revealed by the four Season 1 members (Lee Seung-guk, Im Hyun-seo, Yoon-bi, and Park Sung-min). I tried it.

Question	Lee Seung-guk	Im Hyun-seo	Yunbi	Park Sung-min
Corporate corruption must be reported even if it results in innocent people losing their jobs.	O	O	X	O
Even if it is an internship obtained through connections, there is no problem with hiring if you perform the work perfectly.	X	O	O	X
A competent person is someone who produces results even if it means breaking the rules.	X	O	O	X

Yun-bi addressed the personal perspective, asking, "Wouldn't it be unfair for an employee to lose their job just as they are about to receive a performance bonus?" In contrast, Lee Seung-guk and Park Seong-min argued for the principle that "issues infringing upon the public interest must be brought to light." Isn't it fascinating how the same situation can be viewed so differently?

4. In Season 2, resources differ for each team.

This season is There are a total of four teams: White, who holds the power to determine the prize money; Blue, who manages survival; Red, who controls the game; and Black, who distributes food and information. They are divided into [types]. Lee Seung-guk chose Red, Im Hyun-seo chose Blue saying, "It is meaningless if survival is not guaranteed," Yun-bi chose Black like a negotiator, and Park Sung-min also chose Blue saying, "Ultimately, the goal is to survive."

5. Design Secrets Revealed by the Production Team: "The Moment When Each Person's Best Diverges from Everyone's Best"

The reason for the uneven distribution of life, prize money, and activity rights was inspired by the economic concept of 'comparative advantage,' and it is said that intense psychological warfare naturally ensues when trading for limited resources. Subtitle The 'invisible hand' is based on the premise, like Adam Smith's concept, that equilibrium is achieved when everyone is rational and information is fully disclosed; however, it explains that if information asymmetry occurs, a dilemma arises where each individual's best interests conflict with the best interests of the whole. i did it.

The reason Lee Ji-na, the 'Jar of Desire' from Season 1, is returning was also revealed. She explained that as an economics major, she fits well with the current theme, and thanks to her uninhibited and honest play style, they needed someone to act as a 'constant' within a design full of variables. While they kept spoilers to a minimum, she did leave a hint: "Many things happen during the day, but every night, moments that transcend this unfold." 👀

6. When and where can I see it?

The Values Code Test has been available on Wave's official social channels since September 1st, and The main feature [The Community 2: The Invisible Hand] will be exclusively released on Wavve on September 4 (Fri). Yes, you can. Since the viewer participation test is back just like in Season 1, I recommend participating in advance to choose a character you like and then tune in for the live broadcast!

💡 Frequently Asked Questions (Q&A)

Q. Where can I take the The Community 2 Values Code Test?
A. Shared on Wave's official social channels thecommunity.co.kr/season/2/test You can participate via the link. Entering a name is optional, so anonymous participation is also possible.

Q. When will The Community 2 be released?
A. It will be exclusively released on Wavve on Friday, September 4, 2026. The Values Code Test was released earlier, starting on September 1.

Q. Is the format of the Season 2 test different from Season 1?
A. While the O/X format is maintained, there are many reviews stating that the focus has shifted to yes/no questions, and the domains such as reality-centeredness, individualism, society, idealism, and ethics have been further subdivided.

Q. Could the test questions differ from my actual values?
A. Yes, according to the production team, this test was created for use within the program, so they advise that the measurements may not align with the actual values of the respondents.